24 February 2026 · LinkedIn
I’ve got a prediction for AI in 2026: it’s going to be the year of the wrong questions.
The pace of progress is absurd. While traditional media publish their “does GenAI have any value?” studies of 2025, the people actually using it already have their answer.
I’m one of them. I built 3 personal apps in a few hours over a weekend, testing out the leaps I’d heard about in Claude Code. These were complicated apps with Azure AI API integration, and Google Drive connectivity. Little ideas that make my life easier, bespoke and evolvable in a way no off-the-shelf tool ever could be. It did it fast, it set up everything I needed environment-wise, and it didn’t make mistakes. It is not a party trick.
I’ve seen it on the front lines too. I’ve spoken to leaders in software leveraging these leaps in agentic engineering to achieve 10x output and refactor legacy code. To engineers who report not having written a line of their own code in a year. To established SaaS companies transforming to stay competitive in a world where their incumbent advantage grows stale quickly.
That’s software engineering radically changed, and it’s just the start.
I’ve long argued structured tasks were the core of where AI delivers value in the near to medium term. That still stands: I just didn’t see that agentic architectures would create structure from chaos quite so quickly. More professions will be irrevocably touched as the year progresses.
Which brings me to the wrong questions. By the end of 2026, as the world catches up, these will still dominate:
❗What will happen to these jobs?
❗What profession will be next?
❗Which companies are ahead?
But as this unfolds, we need much bigger, more uncomfortable ones:
🔥How do we support people in an increasingly post-knowledge-labour economy?
🔥How will we leverage these changes for societal good, not just efficiency?
🔥What becomes of human purpose when so much “work” is automated?
These concerns aren't mine alone - there are leaders starting from the right questions rather than the easy ones.
But the gulf between a progress-driven vision and common understanding still worries me. We have a fleeting window, in civilisational terms, to point this technology toward human flourishing before short-term incentives drag it elsewhere.
Do you see the scale of change coming?
Join the conversation on LinkedIn →
← All writing