29 March 2026 · LinkedIn
"There were no lights on": Greg Jackson, CEO of Octopus Energy, toured a Chinese factory producing smartphones at scale and came back with this one detail he couldn't stop repeating.
A design choice, not a power failure. No lights, because there were no workers. Just robots, running continuously, in the dark.
Andrew Forrest walked the length of a Chinese production line watching machines rise from the floor, assemble parts as they moved along a conveyor, and deposit a finished truck at the end.
Jim Farley, CEO of Ford, called it the most humbling thing he'd ever seen. He came back warning that if the West loses this race, Ford has no future.
These are not credulous tourists. They are seasoned industrial operators who have spent careers in manufacturing - and they returned, consistently, with the same word.
Terrified.
The Western conversation about AI and work has been almost entirely conducted in the language of white-collar disruption. Lawyers. Analysts. Consultants. The knowledge economy quietly hollowing out around its edges. It's been a comfortable conversation, in its way - the disruption always seemed to be happening somewhere in the vicinity of a laptop and a Slack channel.
What these factory tours reveal is something operating at a different scale entirely. China has coupled AI-directed logistics, autonomous assembly, and increasingly humanoid labour into a single integrated system. The result is a different order of manufacturing.
Between 2014 and 2024, China went from 189,000 installed industrial robots to over two million. In 2024 alone, it added 295,000 new machines. The UK added 2,500.
The standard Western response frames this as a policy problem: invest in robotics, close the density gap, catch up on capital equipment. That may be right, but it misses the structural difference. China's automation is not being driven by the familiar logic of higher margins and shareholder returns. It is state-directed, demographically motivated, and strategically pursued - a completely different set of incentives, producing a completely different pace.
Which raises a question that Western industrial policy hasn't seriously grappled with yet: When the competitive model isn't the market, what exactly is it that the market is competing against?
Join the conversation on LinkedIn →
← All writing